You should choose Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

You should choose - Essay exampleIn essence, it sh all told analyze the Katrina disaster in regards to the type of decision making method that was embarked on. It will encourage analyze the flaws therein.The policy administrator using this approach must first identify the ends. The implication herein is that the values or goals atomic number 18 first analyzed as how the situation should ultimately end up is outlined. The weights of all the ends are analyzed which means that the expected goals are analyzed from contrastive sectors (Stillman, 2009). It is assumed at this point that the different parties involved have a consensus on the importance of the different goals. At this point, all possible and reasonable sets of means are set forth with an assumption that time and resources to investigate are rigorously set forth. Then, the aforementioned set of means is evaluated against the ends. A quantified measure is assigned with regard to how headspring the set of means does in the achievement of each end. Again, there is an assumption that there is the ability and the resources for the military rank to take place. The overall measure is then calculated based on the assumption of the maximum measure.In this method of decision making, both the ends and the means are intertwined in that it is from the consideration of the means that ends have been concur on by way of compromise, therefore the best that can be done is to find a satisfactory, mutually agree upon end and means. There is an assumption in this approach that the manager has very lower-ranking and limited time and resources (except information) in his decision making process. The implication is that the means considered are actually known. The evaluation process of the means is not as refined as in the root method. In fact, some consequences are often ignored (Stillman, 2009). The means are chosen on the basis of a consensus among the different parties and not results of factors from the analysis. Because